Reviews and judging, made easy
Give every reviewer their own space to score, vote and comment on the submissions assigned to them. Set up review rounds in minutes, keep judging fair with anonymous reviews, and see every score side by side when it's time to decide.

How it works
How it works
Dapple saves your reviewers and judges time to focus on what matters most — the submissions. Everything happens in one place, so the process is seamless, fair, and can be set up in a few minutes.
- Create Review Rounds: Set up bespoke groups of reviewers and assign them to different projects and stages.
- Assign Submissions: As new submissions are received, they are then sent to the right Review Round.
- Dedicated Review Accounts: Reviewers sign in to their own Review Accounts, where they’ll see only the submissions assigned to them.
- Due Dates: Hold reviewers and judges accountable by creating deadlines that display in each individual's dashboard.
- Collate Feedback: See all reviews and feedback saved against each individual submission.
Review rounds
Review rounds
Creating Review Rounds is a bit of a game-changer. Here’s why:
- Involve multiple perspectives: Readers, editors, or judges can all contribute feedback.
- Flexible setup: Create different Review Rounds, with customised rules for different projects.
- Multi-round reviews: Different Review Rounds for different stages. For example, use Round 1 for initial screening and Round 2 for shortlisted work.
- Reviewer flexibility: Reviewers can take part in several Review Rounds at once.
- Remove Bias: Promote fairness by selecting fields on the form that are automatically hidden from reviewers.
- It’s quick!: Assign multiple reviewers to a project in a couple of clicks. It keeps the whole process transparent and organised.
Ways to review
Ways to review
Reviewers can review anywhere, any time, and on any device using their own personalised Review Account. Depending on how you set up your Review Round, reviewers can:
- Rubric Scoring: Score submissions against multiple weighted criteria, like originality and technical ability, and get one clear result out of 100 instead of a single gut-feel number.
- Score: Rate submissions on a scoring scale you define, from a quick 1–5 to a detailed 1–100.
- Vote: Record a straightforward decision, like Yes/No, Shortlist/Reject, or any custom option you choose.
- Comment: Add written feedback alongside a score, so the reasoning behind a decision isn't lost by the time you get to the final discussion.
- Save Feedback: Reviewers can save a review in progress and pick it back up later — no need to get through a whole batch in one sitting.
- Toggle: Move between pending and in-progress reviews without losing your place.
- Complete: Reviewers can batch submit reviews back to the admin in one click.
All feedback in one place
All feedback in one place
On the admin side, all the feedback and reviews are brought together in a single, organised view, saved against each submission.
- Real-time feedback: See up to date feedback from your reviewers regardless of whether it is in progress or completed.
- Transparency: See reviewer comments side by side.
- Set limits: Set minimum or maximum numbers of reviews per submission.
- Record: Track average scores and tallied votes.
- Decide: Compare perspectives across your reviewers. Send to a designated next stage in one click
- Toggle: Quickly skip through each submission, comparing feedback and scores.
Reviewer oversight
Keep track of every reviewer, at a glance
See exactly where each reviewer stands — who's done, who's in progress, and who hasn't started. Stay in control of your review process without chasing anyone manually.
- Full reviewer dashboard: See all your reviewers in one place, with a live snapshot of their progress across completed, in-progress, and outstanding reviews.
- Status at a glance: Progress counts to make it instantly clear how each reviewer is tracking — no digging required.
- Nudge reminders: Send a one-click reminder to reviewers who haven't completed their reviews, keeping the process moving without awkward emails.
- Review group visibility: See which review rounds each reviewer belongs to, so you always know who's responsible for what.
- Joined and last active dates: Track when reviewers joined and when they last submitted a review to spot anyone who's gone quiet.
“I've used Award Force for years. Judging in Dapple is so much more user-friendly, visual and quicker to complete.”
Emily Ridley-FinkFounder & Judge · Wem CeramicsSetup
Four steps from zero to reviews
Most organisations are up and running in just a few minutes.
Create a Review Round
Configure the guidelines, criteria, deadlines and notifications.
Project Settings → ReviewsAssign Reviewers
Assign reviewers to submissions one by one, in bulk, or automatically when a submission reaches a stage.
Stages view → Send to Review RoundReviewers Score
Each reviewer signs in to their own Review Account, sees only the submissions assigned to them, and scores against your criteria.
Reviewer Account → Awaiting ReviewView Feedback & Decide
Scores, votes and comments appear side by side in your dashboard, so you can decide and move submissions on.
Submission → Reviews tabRound anatomy
What's inside a Review Round
Each Review Round is set up on its own, with its own scoring, criteria, guidance, notifications and optional automations. Here's what you can set.
Review Round options
Set these for each round in Project Settings → Reviews
Multi-round
Running review rounds across multiple stages
Create a Review Round for each stage, or for each category. Each is fully independent, and reviewers can overlap or be entirely different people.
Initial Sift
Shortlist
Final Jury
Frequently Asked Questions
A Review Round is the review set-up attached to a stage of your project: its guidance, criteria, scoring, voting options, due date, notifications and optional automations. The reviewers or judges who take part form its Review Group. You can run different rounds for different stages, such as an initial sift and a shortlist round.
Yes, and it's free and easy for them to join. Each reviewer signs in to their own Review Account, where they see only the submissions assigned to them. They have no access to your admin dashboard and can't make final decisions.
Reviewers can rate on a scale you choose, from 1–5 up to 1–100, or use rubric scoring, which weights several criteria into one score out of 100. Voting is fully customisable, so you can go beyond Yes, No or Maybe, and you can add optional comment boxes. Rubric scoring is available on every plan.
Assign them one by one, in bulk, or automatically when a submission reaches a stage. With review pools, submissions are divided between a group of reviewers automatically, so the work is shared fairly. You can also set a minimum and maximum number of reviews for each submission.
Yes. You can hide any form field from reviewers, such as names, contact details or institutions, so work is judged on its merits, or reveal titles and applicant names when you need to. You can also keep reviewers anonymous from your admin team. Hiding fields from reviewers is available on every plan.
Reviewers can flag a conflict of interest and decline a submission with a comment, so you can pass it to someone else.
Yes. Starter includes one review round per project, Growth includes multiple review rounds and Pro is unlimited. Each round can have different reviewers, criteria and scoring.
Starter includes up to 3 reviewers. Growth and Pro include unlimited reviewers, and the same reviewer can take part in several rounds.
Scores, votes and comments appear side by side in your dashboard. Filter, rank and sort the results to build your shortlist, then move submissions to the next stage or decline them. Reviewers do the judging and your team makes every decision.